International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

A dilemma for anomalous monism

Brian P McLaughlin

pp. 21-45

Jaegwon Kim is often viewed as having proposed a dilemma for Donald Davidson: if when Davidson appealed to psychophysical supervenience in “Mental Events,” his appeal was to weak supervenience, then he failed to state how mental properties depend on physical properties; and if his appeal was instead to strong supervenience, then he was appealing to a thesis that is incompatible with anomalous monism. I examine this dilemma in detail, pointing out that it is actually a dilemma for the doctrine of anomalous monism itself. I ultimately argue that it is a false dilemma. But I then state a related dilemma that poses a serious, unresolved prima facie problem for anomalous monism.

Publication details

DOI: 10.19079/metodo.3.2.21

Full citation:

McLaughlin, B.P. (2015). A dilemma for anomalous monism. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 3 (2), pp. 21-45.

This text is available for download in the following format(s)

This document is available at an external location. Please follow the link below. Hold the CTRL button to open the link in a new window.