METODO

International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy

Ion Tănăsescu

with Bourdeau, M. (2022)., Intentionality and the classification of phenomena and sciences in Comte’s Cours de Philosophie Positive and in Brentano’s Empirical Psychology, in I. Tănăsescu, A. Bejinariu, S. Krantz Gabriel & C. Stoenescu (eds.), Brentano and the positive philosophy of Comte and Mill, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 185-221.

(2022)., Franz Brentano and Auguste Comte: the theory of stages and psychology, in I. Tănăsescu, A. Bejinariu, S. Krantz Gabriel & C. Stoenescu (eds.), Brentano and the positive philosophy of Comte and Mill, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 45-137.

(2022)., Introduction, in I. Tănăsescu, A. Bejinariu, S. Krantz Gabriel & C. Stoenescu (eds.), Brentano and the positive philosophy of Comte and Mill, Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 1-7.

with Bejinariu, A. , Krantz Gabriel, S. , Stoenescu, C. (eds) (2022). Brentano and the positive philosophy of Comte and Mill: with translations of original writings on philosophy as science by Franz Brentano, de Gruyter, Berlin.

(2021). Psychologie, Seiendes, Phantasie bei Franz Brentano, de Gruyter, Berlin.

(2019). Monism and particularism: methodology in Brentano's psychology. Axiomathes 29 (4), pp. 397-412.

(2017). The intentionality of sensation and the problem of classification of philosophical sciences in Brentano's empirical psychology. Axiomathes 27 (3), pp. 243-263.

(ed) (2012). Franz Brentano's metaphysics and psychology, Zeta Books, Bucharest.

(2010). Le concept psychologique de la représentation de la fantaisie chez Brentano et sa réception chez Husserl. Studia Phaenomenologica 10, pp. 45-75.

(2003). Ist die Empfindung intentional?: der Brentanosche Hintergrund einer Kritik Husserls. Studia Phaenomenologica 3 (1-2), pp. 75-97.

with Popescu, V. (2003). Introduction. Studia Phaenomenologica 3 (1-2), pp. 9-14.

(2002). Das sein der Kopula: oder was hat Heidegger bei Brentano versäumt?. Studia Phaenomenologica 2 (1-2), pp. 97-123.

(2002). Intenţionalitatea în exegeza brentaniană schiţa unei polemici. Studia Phaenomenologica 2 (3-4), pp. 143-175.