Book | Chapter
(1972) Linguistic analysis and phenomenology, Dordrecht, Springer.
The attempt to reply to a reply may seem inelegant; in the present case, however, I see it as necessary. Professor Tugendhat has presented his view of philosophy with great clarity, and related it to mine by criticism. I wish in turn to present my view through the criticism of his; if you like, I wish to complete the circle of debate.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-01215-2_19
Full citation:
Pettit, P. (1972)., The case for explanation continued: a reply to professor Tugendhat, in W. Mays (ed.), Linguistic analysis and phenomenology, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 267-272.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.