Book | Chapter
(2003) Wholes, sums and unities, Dordrecht, Springer.
Having looked at the advantages which neoclassical mereology offers as contrasted with its classical ancestor, in allowing for conditioned sums, non-unique sums, and mereologically varying sums, and in providing what might seem to be an adequate framework for accounting for traditional higher-grade notions of wholes, I now turn to consider some weaknesses of this flexible theory.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0209-6_7
Full citation:
Meirav, A. (2003). Criticism of the notion of a neoclassical sum, in Wholes, sums and unities, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 167-188.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.